October 2, 2024/CSL Research
Nigeria’s petrol subsidy has long been a source of controversy, deeply intertwined with the nation’s economy and politics. Introduced to keep fuel prices affordable for the general population, the subsidy ensures that the government pays part of the cost of petrol, allowing citizens to buy fuel at a lower price than it would normally cost based on global oil prices. While the subsidy has provided some relief for consumers, it has also been fraught with problems.
One of the main criticisms is that it has been a breeding ground for corruption. Reports of fraudulent claims, where funds are siphoned by oil marketers for non-existent fuel imports, have been a recurring issue. Additionally, the cost of the subsidy has ballooned over the years, placing a significant strain on Nigeria’s finances. The government often borrows to maintain the subsidy, diverting funds from critical sectors like education, infrastructure, and healthcare.
Efforts to remove or reduce the subsidy, however, have faced strong resistance from the public. Fuel price hikes often lead to widespread protests, as seen in 2012 when the then President Goodluck Jonathan attempted to remove the subsidy. Although aimed at curbing the economic drain and encouraging investment in local refining, the removal of the subsidy has led to soaring fuel prices and increased cost of living, putting immense pressure on the poor and middle class.
The Dangote Refinery’s 2024 launch has provided a potential solution, as local refining capacity could stabilize prices by reducing Nigeria’s reliance on expensive fuel imports. However, achieving long-term success hinges on transparency, effective regulation, and managing the social impact of subsidy removal. The debate around Nigeria’s petrol subsidy underscores the complexity of balancing economic reform with social welfare in a country where millions are vulnerable to even small price increases.
Historically, fuel subsidies in the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), and by proxy Nigeria, began in the 1970s during the crude oil revenue boom. This led member countries to kick-off social welfare programmes and infrastructural development projects. The programmes included, amongst other policies, protecting the populace of their countries from the fluctuations of the oil markets by fixing fuel prices. In 1977, it became institutionalised in Nigeria following the promulgation of the Price Control Act which made it illegal for some products (including petrol) to be sold above the regulated price.
Of the three main white petroleum products hitherto subsidised by the government, Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), popularly called petrol has remained the longest standing, with subsidies on diesel and kerosene ceased in 2003 and 2016 respectively when their markets were deregulated. The subsidy on petrol has over the years become a white elephant in the Nigerian corridors with the size of the subsidy being mainly affected by factors such as the global price of crude oil in the international market, the volume of PMS consumed within the country, and spiral devaluation of the Naira.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu announced the removal of the petrol subsidy during his inauguration in May 2023, declaring it “gone.” This bold move was part of a broader reform agenda aimed at reducing the massive financial burden the subsidy placed on government finances, which cost billions of dollars annually. However, the removal of the subsidy led to a sharp increase in petrol prices, causing widespread public discontent and a steep rise in the cost of living. In response to the severe economic impact and public outcry, the government partially reversed this decision later in 2023, reintroducing some level of subsidy or price regulation for a period to manage the social and economic fallout.
It is without doubt that the short, medium, and long-term gains of the complete deregulation of the PMS market far outweighs the immediate economic challenges it presents where the savings can be put to judicious use and the government shows transparency. Some of these gains include: 1) substantial reduction in fiscal deficit and government borrowing, 2) increase in government revenue plus judicious use of freed-up revenues for critical sector investment, 3) eradication of cross-border petrol smuggling and its associated security risks, 4) improve the nation’s sovereign credit rating based on better fiscal position and thereby lowering the country’s cost of borrowing.
The removal of fuel subsidies has always been a politically sensitive issue in Nigeria. For many, the subsidy is viewed as a form of social security in a country where healthcare and social safety nets are largely absent. While removing the subsidy may ease the government’s already strained finances, it places additional pressure on Nigerian consumers and small businesses, who are already under significant economic stress. Although subsidy removal could theoretically free up funds for development, past experiences, such as with the SURE-P program, show that the expected long-term growth and development often fail to materialize. Many Nigerians remain sceptical that savings from the subsidy will translate into tangible benefits for the population.
The Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Program (SURE-P) was introduced by Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan in January 2012. It was established as part of the government’s response to the partial removal of fuel subsidies. The goal of SURE-P was to reinvest the savings from the reduction of fuel subsidies into critical infrastructure and social safety net programs. The initiative aimed to reduce the economic burden caused by the subsidy removal while addressing infrastructure deficits and providing jobs for unemployed youth. While SURE-P made some strides, particularly in job creation and infrastructure development, it fell short of fully achieving its intended goals. The program’s success was limited by corruption, inefficiency, and a lack of transparency. Its most significant failure was its inability to provide long-term solutions to Nigeria’s unemployment and infrastructure challenges
Kindly click on the below link to download the full report.
CSL Research – Dangote refinery and Nigeria’s controversial fuel subsidy.pdf
