(PHOTO: IMF PHOTO/K M ASAD) All countries, rich and poor, must adapt to climate change to cope with droughts, storms, and sea-level rise. Countries can reap large rewards by investing in resilient growth and integrating adaptation into development strategies, the IMF’s Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva writes in a new blog with Vitor Gaspar and Ceyla Pazarbasioglu. Yet countries that need to adapt the most often lack the means to do so. They typically lack the financing and the institutional capacity to implement needed adaptation programs, the authors write, drawing on the findings of three Staff Climate Notes covering climate adaptation and fiscal policy, macro-fiscal implications, and bringing climate adaptation into the mainstream of fiscal planning. –Daunting costs: According to IMF staff estimates, annual adaptation needs exceed 1 percent of GDP in about 50 low-income and developing economies for the next 10 years. The costs can be even larger for small, island nations exposed to tropical cyclones and rising seas, up to 20 percent of GDP. The international community can help poor and vulnerable countries adapt by providing financial support and developing institutional capacity. “These countries will suffer the most devastating impacts of climate change even though they’re not responsible for causing it,” the authors write. Find all the IMF’s Staff Climate Notes, which cover the impact of climate change on macroeconomic and financial stability, here. (PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES/ZHORZH2008) As well as a devastating impact on Ukraine’s people and economy, Russia’s war is having wider ramifications related to remittances, refugees, and energy and food prices, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said in a live conversation with Foreign Policy magazine editor Ravi Agrawal. For countries that depend on imports of energy and food from Russia and Ukraine, the impact will be devastating, Georgieva said. “A war in Ukraine means hunger in Africa.” Speaking in the same conversation, the IMF’s First Deputy Managing Director Gita Gopinath agreed that developing economies especially are at risk from rising food prices. “The longer this war lasts, the more grievous the problems become,” she said. In a podcast with The Economist’s Money Talks, Gopinath expanded on the global economic implications of the war. –Europe, Africa: The IMF’s Alfred Kammer spoke to the BBC about the war’s economic effects within Europe and beyond (20:50), while the IMF’s Papa N’Diaye described the impact on sub-Saharan Africa in a separate BBC interview (43:50). The IMF has disbursed emergency assistance of $1.4 billion to Ukraine under a Rapid Financing Instrument. IMF staff remain closely engaged with the authorities to provide policy support. 📺 Watch Georgieva and Gopinath talk to Foreign Policy about the war in Ukraine and what it means for the global economy.Find all the IMF’s statements, remarks and social media posts about the war in Ukraine here. (PHOTO: IMF) Last December, there were news reports that a Black woman, Tenisha Tate-Austin, had the appraised value of her home in California raised by half a million dollars by having a white friend pretend to own it. When an economist heard of this, he shrugged and simply said, “Bertrand and Mullainathan.” He didn’t need to say more: he was citing one of the most famous papers in economics of the past two decades, a 2004 study by Marianne Bertrand and Sendhil Mullainathan, both currently professors at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. –Explicit prejudice or unconscious bias: They sent nearly 5,000 fictitious resumes in response to job ads in Boston and Chicago and found that Black-sounding names, such as Lakisha, were 50 percent less likely to get a callback than white-sounding names, such as Emily, even though the resumes had been rigged to be alike in qualifications. It was difficult to attribute the result to anything other than explicit prejudice or unconscious bias. It’s one of several papers that have cemented Bertrand’s reputation for documenting why so many, such as women and minorities, do not do as well as they deserve, while some, such as top CEOs, are paid a lot more than they deserve. In an article for the March issue of F&D Magazine, the IMF’s Prakash Loungani profiles Marianne Bertrand.Check out our March Issue of Finance & Development, which focuses on “Rethinking Fiscal: Public Finance and Fairness in a Changed World”.Want to get a print copy delivered to your home or office? Click here to subscribe. |